The Next 2 Years: DAO Resolution Pt.1

[SailorJupiter]

I’m only half way thru reading yet, but this point tickles me:

@Kash

Now, a year in, the $JUP has not been spent, and the Team is committed to topping up the DAO Treasury to $10m USDC once more for the DAO to allocate over the following 2 years.

This is your initial commitment:

@0xSoju

To ensure that the DAO will be able to execute on these crucial things over the long term, we will aim to top up the same budget on a yearly basis.

So basically you’re reducing your commitment with this proposal? Why? @Kash
Even if it’s unused, this is like escaping your already made commitment.

Edit: I get that you want to transition to an independent funding which somehow involves the litterbox. This is ofc desirable. But I don’t get why you cut your yearly top-up plan to a once more for 2 years plan.

Altogether the draft sounds reasonable. But it’s like with lawmakers proposing new rules here, a lot of shiny bla bla rules just to hide the uncomfortable rules which actually matter.

@Kash

Pathways for community proposals to go to a DAO vote based on community sentiment

Does this mean that the community / DAO will be able to create a vote (on a topic with momentum) all by itself? Or will the Team keep the last word?

@Kash

~400,000 voting wallets

I’ve read this many times, and I guess the Team knows exactly how many wallets voted.
So in this case I can only repeat what others said multiple times: “stop pretending”.
This doesn’t shed a good light on your intensions.

(for those who don’t know the actual numbers: It’s roughly 150,000 voters per vote.
I hate bloated marketing numbers)

Cheers!