Why Stakers Are Paying for Jupuary: The Risks of the Airdrop and a Call for Sustainable Growth

The Jupuary airdrop might sound like a massive gift, but let’s be real, stakers are the ones paying for it. Adding 700 million tokens, half the current circulating supply, in one go is huge, and it’s going to hit staking rewards hard.

First off, JUP is already inflationary, and the ASR rewards we get now are just enough to balance that. This airdrop will dilute staking rewards because they’ll be spread across way more tokens. Staking is one of the main reasons people hold JUP, so if those rewards drop too much, it could hurt the system long-term.

Second, this idea that burning 30 percent of the supply that is uncirculating balances things out doesn’t hold up. The tokens being burned aren’t in circulation, so it won’t affect the price. It just makes the supply shock a bit smaller, but it’s still not bullish at all.

Also, Jupuary might bring in new users, but what does that actually do for stakers? Most of those new people won’t hold or stake; they’ll just sell their airdropped tokens. The real winners here are the team, not long-term supporters.

There’s also the uncertainty factor. When people don’t know what’s coming, they hesitate, whether it’s buying, staking, or holding. This kind of uncertainty causes hesitation, which is bad for trust in the ecosystem. And let’s face it, stability in token value is what actually builds trust, not massive airdrops.

And the whales? They’re already leaving because they can’t risk what’s about to happen. You can see it on the charts. This also means fewer people voting against Jupuary because those who really don’t want it to happen have already sold.

But I have to give major props to Meow and the team for putting a 70% quorum on this vote. That’s a smart move to make sure this decision reflects the majority’s interest and not just a small group. It’s a great way to ensure that everyone has a voice in something as big as this.

I don’t think this is the right way to grow. Instead of dropping a ton of tokens, we could focus on rewarding the people who are actually loyal and engaged. Fee reductions for active traders, referral bonuses, or activity-based challenges are all better ways to grow the ecosystem sustainably.

Look at what Bonk did, burning tokens when people actually contributed to the community. That’s how you grow organically, by rewarding real engagement and belief in the project. Airdrops like this, on the other hand, just inflate supply and hope for the best. We could take a page from their playbook and focus on driving growth through meaningful rewards rather than hoping more tokens equals more value.

Finally, my biggest issue: what happens after Jupuary? With so many new tokens in circulation, staking rewards will drop a lot. That’s a huge problem because staking is such a big reason for holding JUP in the first place. Sure, we could launch a new ASR program, but that just adds even more uncertainty.

I’m not trying to spread FUD, I still fully believe in the platform and what we’re building here. I just think this airdrop has some major risks that aren’t being talked about enough. If anyone shares my views or has counterarguments, I’d love to hear them.

26 Likes

Agree with most of your points but I would say it’s not stakers alone who get hit: it really is anyone who holds JUP (which I suppose we’re equating to stakers).

I am a believer in the Jupiter ecosystem but it feel JUP as a token is not the right way to bet on it which is something that we should be working towards.

Fee rebates/activity challenges sounds like the right away to reward users and the ones who are generating revenue for Jupiter and that would be clearly decided ahead of time instead of some potentially everchanging criteria.

8 Likes

“Adding 700 million tokens, half the current circulating supply, in one go is huge, and it’s going to hit staking rewards hard.”
Strongly agree.
I have been staking since day 1. Participated in all but 1 vote. Bought a lot of JUP to add to my airdrop, never sold a token. The product, community and team are excellent.
I don’t believe there is clear evidence that this airdrop will really grow the user-base or participation. That said, I feel the team deserves our trust as maybe they will prove to be right but I do not think this should be done in a manner that makes stakers question their position. If you are not going to include stakers, are going to increase token supply and staked tokens, it’s to be expected that stakers will consider unstaking and selling before the airdrop.

The essay by Meow was compelling but entirely vague. I’m in private chats with other stakers and it’s the first time we are considering unstaking and selling. I assume our thoughts are reflective of stakers at large. Many of us are silent because the loudest voices are all parroting the same group think.

Bias is inevitable but I have never thought giving a big % of the drop to stakers was the way to go, but also don’t think additional selling pressure (from stakers unstaking of airdroppers dumping) is good for anyone. I ask for the community to game this out and think in terms of incentives. If you were a large staker, what would you do?

11 Likes

I’ve been saying all this for a month now just to get laughed at and I’m simply bored to explain it any further for people who are not in the same spot and thus can’t understand it.

I advice to think about the personal risk tolerance, adjust if needed and then we vote.

8 Likes

talking of large staker id do not like to drag it more but this topic might fit you after all you did mentioned bias is inevitable its pointless talking to you tho, will wrap it here.

another meow post fits your mindset.

4 Likes

I have already read this and completely agree with some of the points raised. I read most things on the forum. Having incentives doesn’t mean I’m not able to have best interests of the community at heart.
I want jupiter to succeed, I use the product daily and will continue regardless of owning JUP or not. A fair system is a very hard and balanced thing to design.
I think the airdrop strategy may have negative consequences for the token price. I think it’s simply game theory. It makes unstaking and selling too compelling an option. I think that is a negative.

6 Likes
1 Like

just a general thinking fix me here, if really large stakers getting that high yield and worried about the price aint yall the one dumping on our head if thats the biggest concern? the real ones who care would have seen as an opportunity and said we could eat the dip but watching it as if could add n extra layer of benefit, weird im a staker aswell but maybe not large as u’ve mentioned, seeing the same mindset people grouping and pushing the same narrative forward dont you think its atleast worth caring and respecting the privilege thats given to vote deciding the outcome of the project regardless it was clear indicator of having jupuary every year rather demanding like 50% shares on top of ASR lol, forgive me but even if jupuary doesnt seems to happen meow clearly wont reward mercenaries, the upcoming vote clear indicate the motive of its upto, thats what meow anticipating aswell.

5 Likes

fwiw I didn’t say I’m a larger staker, I am thinking about what decisions might be made in a “Keynesian beauty contest” style game. “What would you do if you were a large staker?” It matters what I think other stakers will do.
I also at no point made any demands for anything. I am pointing out what I believe to be a possible negative effect. I am concerned.
It is definitely unfair and a concern for too many votes being the hands of too few people. It is not good for the system. Anyone can see that and I believe this will change over time but that does not chance my view point of the consequences of the airdrop strategy. I don’t believe this is the fix for that and see it as bad strategic move for the token value.
I care about the token value, I don’t think that’s wrong. Not the only thing I care about but I want to make money whilst participating in projects that I think really matter. It attracts more eyeballs and new community better than anything else. Number go up beats all other marketing.

4 Likes

yeah every buyer says the same he cares about the value as if the producer which is clearly are the teams dont care about this marketing strategy? maybe specifically not you but the ‘apes together stronger’ mindset ones need to read what meow really said at the rally or read the ample amount of essays to understand what he wants to convey and cares more than.

you didnt completed this sentence, im curious to know more. fret not but i wanted u to fix my last concern as a humble informative aspect. even solana itself has 10% locked does its demand goes or stays while unlocking the respective amount over a period of time or the jupsol or helius staked sol, juicysol, msol (marinade staked sol), dsol (drift staked sol), bonksol finding to demand on top of active yield, its no brainer comparing but still part of staked finance meta. crypto is and was always volatile, not upto everyones capabilities to conquer only the rough one survives or could precisely demand 1:1 on every unlock lol while seeing it as an opportunity and hitting the boundaries to keep more inclined in bias opinion which could be inevitable sometimes.

1 Like

I strongly agree with this. I’m completely surprised at how it went from 75% for instant claiming to no vesting. Maybe Meow doesn’t care about the short term PA of the token, but for some of us this is a huge deal. I have a tremendous amount of respect for Meow, but as the main cat, he needs to protect his kittens… We’ve seen posts regarding how mid is bad… but there needs to be some mid here to protect the current holders of JUP. This is a huge supply shock and the impact needs to be lessened. Sanctum’s earnestness drop vesting period is quite fair. Those who needed liquidity or wanted to sell could do so, and the longer they hold, the more they are released per epoch with any tokens forfeited going back to the treasury. Also, if by chance vesting is put on the table, not allowing these tokens to vote would also protect the current stakers and not allow “fake” members into the community. I want to vote yes and support JUP’s vision, but this is too risky…

3 Likes

I’m not a whale, but I do have a 6 figure staked bag. I appreciate the amount of time, effort and passion Meow put into the essay, but I agree it was vague and we need to read between the lines. You bring up many good points, and I agree the largest stakers are typically quite silent. There are a lot of “Yes men” on X with small amounts of JUP staked. It seems like the majority of CT is going to vote yes, but the large holders all have the same fear and I can’t see them voting “comfortable” at this point in time. I believe Jupuary needs to happen for Jupiter’s reputation and I 100% believe in this team. We just need more reassurances that we don’t get rekt.

1 Like

Miuq, the vast majority of people aren’t in your situation and probably never will be… Let them laugh but remember that there are people who have read what you wrote and take it seriously. I am one of them and have the same concerns. I don’t think this will pass on the first try, but I’m sure we can get there and become a stronger more unified community!

3 Likes

I believe the 700m tokens should only be given to the stakers, if it was for everyone the price of JUP is going to plummet, all the people farming the airdrop are gonna dump them straight onto the market and move onto the next token.

If we want new users then give them an incentive to lock up their JUP and get on board with the project to get included in the rewards. Most traders who use and believe in Jupiter are already the stakers like us.

1 Like

Without new users, we can’t grow. Users should receive a gift as they help grow the protocol. It would just be nice if stakers got a bonus for locking up our JUP to show support.

there are number of consequences to this not every user could likely dump nor every likely to hold simple, every consequences comes with a relative reaction and believe me in any sake its not going to be ASR 2.0 indeed its stakers deciding if they get the benefit or not to act accordingly, as long as you reward there is stakers, thats how ASR works.

1 Like

Hey,

Loved the ideas.

Seems the team wants to constantly try to reinvent the wheel and not learn from successful case studies.

I strongly believe the vote for the 2 jupuaries won’t pass and that there ultimately won’t be any jupuary in January.

Why?
1-Even though we all knew jupuary would happen a year in advance, the community has grown tremendously, things need to change, old ways of thinking cannot be applied to what jup has become now.
2-The sentiment is low, no stakers I know seem excited about this, but more scared than ever.
3-Bad communication from the team.

You are not trying to FUD anything here, I used to be a strong voice for the platform, it’s just that most ideas me and my friends would bring about adding utility to the token, and finding more sustainable ways to grow the users were deemed unfeasible or ignored.
This proves that jup token has a lot of limitations.

6 Likes

Look what happened with Pyth after they dropped a large amount of tokens, increasing the circulating supply, the current token price is approx 60% below just prior to when the tokens were released, but the marketcap is roughly the same now, as what it was prior to the large token release.
Make no mistake, dropping 700 million tokens into the current circulating supply, more than half what is current circulating, will dilute the value of your holdings possbily by half.
Couple with there being no locking or vesting period, people will jeet their free money from the airdrop, adding more downward pressure to the value of our bags.
Don’t be surprised if a few whales start selling off, waiting for the big drop in price, late January, early February, buying back in at a cheaper price, getting more tokens for their money.
I’ll be voting no, as there is nothing but downside from a tokens holders perspective.

4 Likes

Community is only that strong how strong is token.
We need to prevent any step-backs and find another way how to get new people to this community than simply giving them free tickets. It’s completely different situation now than at first Jupuary.

No for Jupuary is absolutely the most bullish outcome from this. People who hesitate to buy now because don’t want to be dumped on soon will be more calm and $JUP as a token will have the chance to catch SOL pump.

People will stay using jupiter products with or without incentives because it’s simply the best.

6 Likes

Your jup your choice nvm, but as a staker and integral fee paying user id loved to encourage to revoke ASR lets see who stays on this committed initiative lol, although there would be no stakers, but still users will thrive and the product economy. now think again whos mean.
as usual bias is inevitable who cares.

1 Like