The Paradox of Structure: Finding the Sweet Spot in Decentralised Organisations

The Paradox of Structure: Finding the Sweet Spot in Decentralized Organizations

It’s undeniable that traditional organizations often become bogged down by excessive bureaucracy and inefficient processes. However, I believe that decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) can benefit from incorporating some elements of structure, without sacrificing their core values of autonomy and flexibility.

Here’s why:

  • Efficiency and Waste Reduction: While structure is often associated with rigidity, it can actually help reduce waste and improve efficiency. Think of it like a well-organized kitchen: having designated places for utensils and ingredients makes cooking faster and easier. Similarly, clear processes and roles within a DAO can streamline decision-making and prevent duplication of effort.

  • Avoiding Single Points of Failure: In traditional organizations, relying on a single person for critical tasks can be risky. DAOs can mitigate this by distributing responsibility and empowering multiple individuals. However, this requires clear documentation and knowledge sharing, which can be facilitated by a degree of structure.

  • The Power of Autopilot: Experts often perform tasks intuitively, without consciously thinking about every step. This “autopilot” mode comes from years of experience and ingrained knowledge. In DAOs, capturing this expertise and making it accessible to others can be invaluable. This is where documentation, guidelines, and even mentorship programs can play a crucial role.

  • Focus and Clarity: While spontaneity can be exciting, having a clear agenda and objectives can help DAOs stay focused and achieve their goals. This doesn’t mean every meeting needs to be rigidly structured, but having a framework can ensure that key topics are addressed and progress is made. This was highlighted during the Catstanbul DAO session on Day 2, where participants observed that “winging it” sometimes led to repetition and a lack of focus.

  • Building a Strong Community: A sense of shared purpose and values is essential for any successful DAO. By establishing clear guidelines and expectations, we can foster a stronger sense of community and ensure that everyone is pulling in the same direction.

Striking the Right Balance

The key is to find the sweet spot between structure and flexibility. We can learn from the successes of traditional organizations, while avoiding their pitfalls.

Here are some practical suggestions:

  • Develop clear onboarding processes to help new members understand the DAO’s values, goals, and operating procedures.
  • Create a knowledge base to document processes, decisions, and best practices.
  • Establish communication channels that facilitate efficient information sharing and collaboration.
  • Implement a system for tracking progress on key initiatives and projects.

A Proposal: The Problem-Solving Working Group

To further enhance efficiency and address challenges effectively, I propose the creation of a Problem-Solving Working Group. This group would be responsible for:

  • Gathering JUP community feedback: Collecting and documenting problems and improvement suggestions from the entire JUP community.
  • Prioritization: Analyzing and prioritizing the identified issues based on their impact and urgency.
  • Solution development: Investigating the root causes of problems, collaborating with relevant stakeholders, and proposing potential solutions.
  • Community voting: Presenting proposed solutions to the JUP community for a vote, ensuring that decisions are made collectively and transparently.

This structured approach to problem-solving can help the JUP become more efficient, responsive, and ultimately, more successful.

Let’s discuss! What are your thoughts on the role of structure in DAOs? How can we find the right balance between autonomy and organization? What do you think of the Problem-Solving Working Group proposal?

1 Like

Everyone in the Dao has different abilities knowledge and qualities. As it stands from what I can see at the moment the team is in charge but 100% listens to the Dao and implement’s a lot of feedback and reads all discussions between all members. That’s how it’s structured for the moment. Could be wrong.

1 Like

Regarding the onboarding id argue the CAWG are already doing an awesome job at this whilst being supported by the jup team. An example of this is the posters made by them suggetsing how to become cadet or a FAQ flyer they have done.
The jup team support this by implementing the jup mobile invite system.

In my opinion i dont think we need a work group for this, as it is already being done.

The knowledge base however, is a great idea. Ive spoken to 2 other members who want to create an info site explaining all the new features to jup : bc they all happen so quickly. This combats the issue where team release announcements with little explaination.

3 Likes

Just by incentivizing to vote , and to participate holds holds value within itself so a merit based simple system based off common sense.

3 Likes