This. Isn’t it weird that people want to know if and how much jup they will get, before deciding if Jupuary should happen or not? This is not about us as individuals…
What this is about is the Choice, Chance & ability for Anyone and Everyone to have a Say, Whatever that be, So be it. Common Sense and General understanding will outweigh most if not all Unclean proposals because the Jupiverse is amazing on all fronts. The Team might just be one of the hardest working Teams in the world…
-Comment Noted My Friend.,
While we don’t have to burn the tokens (I for one, don’t want to burn anything), we don’t necessarily need to decide on all 700m tokens at the same time if we were to cancel Jupuary. The release could be smaller and gradual, and could be done over the next 10-20 years if we choose to as a DAO.
There shouldn’t be “one” snapshot before the vote, if we are to have a system where we already know the criteria then we should have the final snapshot before this occurs.
I do agree that it is hard to vote on any proposal in which you don’t know the functional decision in advance however.
My worry would be that top staking whales would vote down anything that wasn’t overwhelmingly linear and focused towards staking, despite the fact that we have huge ASR rewards already. Having the criteria unknown somewhat increases incentive to do the right thing, which is let the team do what they did last time, which was exceptional for the project so far.