As I always like to say with airdrops.
Expect nothing
Appreciate everything.
4 Likes
I don’t think linear distribution implies that everyone will receive same allocation.
I feel like we can say that kind of distribution is EQUAL DISTRIBUTION
Linear distribution means users will get allocation based on Their input
Input maybe in different form.
Project like parcel,kamino used LINEAR airdrop distribution format.
While project like Jito, Jupiter used Tiered airdrop allocation method.
2 Likes
We will be more active for the 3 months designated for JUPUARY discussion
- criteria
- distribution format etc. will be discussed extensively as from November 3
1 Like
I agree with this, i wasn’t around for the 1st either but have been active since. I prefer this forum as tend not to use discord as well. I’m not big on commenting but an avid reader, keep up the great discussions everyone
3 Likes
Welcome anytime bro!
I love see new users In here daily.
It’s good to see as many perspectives as possible. There is never a wrong answer only an opinion . 
5 Likes
If you will ask me about what JUPUARY criteria should be , I will show you this picture.
I will talk about it later
But just go and understand that picture, then you will know the criteria is that picture
5 Likes
I think 25% for DEX volume seems way too low, because in the end… JUP is a DEX, that’s the main product that JUP offers (swap, DCA, Limit, etc.) and we should reward the most, in my opinion. Of course I believe we should also reward those with threads and that are active on socials but in the end is DEX volume that makes JUP the #1 platform in Solana and not the threads
1 Like
The accurate designed that represent everything about the jupiverse.
3 Likes
That chart is jupiverse itself
1 Like
-
We need to understand what it means to be decentralised.
Why will unstaking and restaking of token be a penalty. It didn’t adds up. It will not be good we are hiding under one finger. Even Active stakings(Staking and voting) should just be a multiplier, cos why did we have ASR.
Let talk about planetary call ; we use to have lot of attendees- we have close to 10k for the last one ,if I’m not mistaken, but when it is time to distribute poap , the form is opened for maybe 5 mins, which means it is FCFS basis, so what should happen to those that are unable to fill and attend the call.
As for me , I will never thought of poap as a criterion. -
For community- I will not limit contributions to only role holders in the community, all of us can’t have the role , but majority of us have meaningful contributions, literally on JUP discord , I can say most people had now start to help community member, cos they knew there will be catdet role at the end of the day
There maybe a base reward to role holders and if there are other communities member that submit any contributions, they should be checked out too. -
Onchain trading will still have more allocations compared to other criteria. I think 25% should be allocated to other criteria while the 75% will be for Dex trading.
Dex trading is actually a great milestone that Jupiter team can’t take with levity hand , we have massive people using Jupiter , but most of them have not used Jupiter directly. There are datas for that. The most saturated features on Jupiter is the swap with over 9.5M users , this is brought by integration of jup swap into several dexes, other features have less than 300k users.
The Jupiter swap volume my not take much weight or other features will get a 2x or 3x multiplier.
And there should be a base volume and base amount of transaction that a user must have before they qualified for base airdrop requirement.
All in all : Expect nothing , Appreciate Everything
2 Likes
Please can you shed more light on this just cos I couldn’t read some further explanation on how we get a ‘penalty’ for ‘unstaking & restaking’.