DAO Proposal: Reward Long-Term Stakers & Build Real Yield

Proposals
42

Great job . I think your idea would definitely reduce sell pressure and increase the value proposition of participating in the DAO as a whole.

2 Likes
43

Thanks! I’ll be sharing a real proposal soon, maybe after that we can see if there’s a way to collaborate.

@Rodrigues770471

44

Hello @Naughty40

Thank you! I truly appreciate your support, that’s exactly the kind of impact we’re aiming for.

@Rodrigues770471

1 Like
45

Your idea sounds good, I’m not a regular here, but your proposal deserves attention, I’ve just voted.

2 Likes
46

Hello, @marcoslpalhano,

Thanks! I truly appreciate your support. :+1:

@Rodrigues770471

1 Like
47

I wish this proposal should be put in to consideration. The long-term stakers deserve more certainty.

3 Likes
48

Love this direction — especially the emphasis on long-term alignment and rewarding real commitment. One idea that might complement the proposal: offering stakers access to exclusive governance briefings or early-stage proposal drafts could strengthen their role as core contributors. It’s not just about yield — it’s about deep involvement. Let’s keep building a sustainable, engaged DAO!

2 Likes
49

Awesome proposal, it makes and encouraged long term stakers to commit their stakes for long-term and boost their voting power.

4 Likes
50

Thanks for sharing your opinion!

@Rodrigues770471

2 Likes
51

Thanks for adding your thoughts!
@Rodrigues770471

1 Like
52

Appreciate the positive feedback!
@Rodrigues770471

3 Likes
53

We’re broadly supportive of initiatives to incentivize long term stacking. We would, however, like to see more economic modeling work done to show how this would impact inflation under various stacking % assumptions.

Further incentives for governance participation, similar to what Arbitrum DAO is doing, is worth looking into. We want to incentive more governance participation, not simply locking and logging off. So tying incentives to voting history is a good first step.

2 Likes
54

Hello!

After carefully studying the proposal, I would like to mention a couple of points that are worth considering.:

For ordinary users and traders: if the reward and stacking system becomes too confusing or opaque, it can undermine the confidence of ordinary participants in the DAO. No one wants to feel like a student who hasn’t been given a cheat sheet on an exam.

For the community as a whole: a possible stratification of interests between long-term stakers, short-term participants and newcomers can lead to internal friction. And when the team starts to pull the blanket in different directions, the stability of the system suffers.

Yes, these are not critical technical risks, but such “human” nuances directly affect the atmosphere, the sense of justice and, as a result, the longevity of the entire project.

1 Like
55

Hello, @DZENARb appreciate you feedback!

I agree that simplicity and clarity are essential. However, I firmly believe that those who support the project over the long term should be recognized and fairly rewarded.

This proposal was designed with exactly that principle in mind: strengthening the community by rewarding long-term commitment and trust, which are fundamental to the stability and sustainable growth of the ecosystem.

@Rodrigues770471

56

Hello, @EventHorizonDAO,

Thanks for the feedback!

My proposal is built on the principle that those who support the project long term should be rewarded,

that’s what builds a strong and sustainable community.

I agree that just locking tokens isn’t enough: to have a dynamic DAO, it’s essential to tie rewards to active governance participation, like voting and ongoing engagement. This further strengthens the spirit of the proposal and ensures a vibrant, committed ecosystem.

@Rodrigues770471

1 Like
57

i like the idea of possibly rewarding longer term stakers in general

2 Likes
58

Hello @defikev,

Thanks for the feedback! :+1:

@Rodrigues770471